It ends with a definition of the American identity, it's somewhere between Donald Duck and Muhammad Ali. And, this, more or less, is how I make my entree to academic publishing. Nuff said.
“An interesting and unique read… Each scholarly contribution makes a
creative effort to cross the traditional boundaries of anthropological
theories and methods with other closely related disciplines. It is an
excellent example of anthropological cross-disciplinary engagement with
psychology, philosophy, aesthetics, film, and theater and music theory.” · Jana Kopelentova Rehak, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Anthropological writings on humour are not very numerous or extensive,
but they do contain a great deal of insight into the diverse mental and
social processes that underlie joking and laughter. On the basis of a
wide range of ethnographic and textual materials, the chapters examine
the cognitive, social, and moral aspects of humour and its potential to
bring about a sense of amity and mutual understanding, even among
different and possibly hostile people. Unfortunately, though, cartoons,
jokes, and parodies can cause irremediable distress and offence.
Nevertheless, contributors’ cross-cultural evidence confirms that the
positive aspects of humour far outweigh the danger of deepening
divisions and fuelling hostilities.
Lidia Dina Sciama is former Director of the
International Gender Studies Centre (formerly the Centre for
Cross-Cultural Research on Women), University of Oxford, where she is
currently a Research Associate. She is the author of
A Venetian Island: Environment, History and Change in Burano (Berghahn 2003).
Series: Volume 8, Social Identities
